BMA Re-evaluates Disciplinary Action in Procurement Scandal
Investigations into a controversial procurement scandal are ongoing, with officials stressing that the matter is far from concluded despite criticism over initial disciplinary measures. The Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) is currently undergoing a comprehensive review of disciplinary actions taken against individuals implicated in the procurement process.
Civil Service Commission Leads Reassessment
On Tuesday, it was confirmed that the BMA’s Civil Service Commission (CSC) has taken charge of the case. The commission has ordered a reassessment of the disciplinary proceedings, aiming to ensure appropriate penalties are applied. Beyond disciplinary actions, the CSC is also examining issues of civil liability, which could include potential claims for damages.
National Anti-Corruption Commission Also Investigating
In parallel, the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) is conducting its own independent investigation into the matter. This dual approach underscores the seriousness with which the irregularities are being treated.
Background of the Investigation
The BMA’s authority in this situation is primarily limited to disciplinary proceedings. Following allegations of irregularities in seven procurement projects, the agency initially established a fact-finding committee, which was followed by a disciplinary committee. These committees investigated a total of 32 officials.
However, concerns were raised when the initial findings resulted in penalties perceived as excessively light. This prompted a directive for a review of the disciplinary actions. When the disciplinary panel upheld its original conclusions, the case was escalated to the CSC for further review.
Streamlining the Process
When questioned about the decision not to form a new committee, officials explained that such a move would only serve to prolong the investigation. The current strategy focuses on leveraging the greater authority of the CSC and the NACC to effectively address the case.
Public Scrutiny and Repercussions
The controversy was reignited recently when a Member of Parliament for Bangkok, Mr. Suphanat Minchaiynunt, publicly challenged the handling of the case by Governor Chadchart Sittipunt and former Deputy Governor Tavida Kamolvej. Mr. Suphanat highlighted that the committee appointed by Governor Chadchart had cleared 20 of the 32 investigated officials. The remaining 12 were found guilty of minor disciplinary violations, resulting in a mere 2% salary cut, equivalent to approximately 600 baht each.
The BMA has reiterated that the case is not closed and that disciplinary penalties will be implemented in accordance with established government regulations.
